island water authority case study
CUSTOMER STORIES

How a gas distribution company cut call center volume by 68% and freed its field teams from reactive maintenance forever

68%
3
0
0
Reduction in Call Center Volume

78% customer self-service adoption rate - portal and mobile app

$2.4M
Annual Ongoing Savings

sustained across customer service and field operations

41%
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
Reduction in Maintenance Costs

shift from reactive dispatch to predictive scheduling

The customer self-service portal and predictive maintenance capabilities of SMART360 fundamentally changed how we operate. Our call center staff now focuses on complex customer needs rather than routine requests, and our maintenance teams are proactive rather than reactive. The board is impressed with both the operational and financial outcomes.

- Customer Service Director
Gas Distribution Company

THE PROBLEM

A call center answering questions that a portal could and a maintenance team always one emergency behind

For a gas distribution company serving 45,000 connections, two problems were compounding each other quietly. The first was visible: a call center absorbing an unsustainable volume of routine inquiries - balance checks, payment confirmations, service request status, outage updates. Every one of those calls was handled by a trained customer service employee who could have been solving something that actually required human judgment. Instead, they were a manual lookup system.

The second problem was less visible but more expensive. Field maintenance teams operated reactively — dispatched to failures rather than preventing them. Paper-based inspection processes meant documentation happened after the fact, safety compliance required manual assembly of records, and there was no system to flag aging infrastructure before it became an incident. In a gas distribution context, reactive maintenance isn't just a cost problem. It's a safety risk.

Key friction points before SMART360

  • Call center overwhelmed by routine inquiries - balance checks, payment status, and service updates consuming skilled staff capacity
  • No customer self-service channel - every interaction required a phone call during business hours
  • Reactive maintenance model - field teams dispatched to failures rather than preventing them
  • Paper-based safety inspection documentation - compliance reporting assembled manually with no automated alerts
  • No predictive visibility into infrastructure condition - aging assets identified only after failure
"Our call center was overwhelmed with routine customer inquiries while our field teams were stuck in reactive maintenance cycles. We needed to fundamentally transform our customer engagement model."

— Customer Service Director, Gas Distribution Company

Why SMART360 and why 12 weeks was the right timeline

The solution the Gas Distribution Company needed required two things working together: a customer-facing self-service layer that could deflect the majority of routine call volume, and a field operations system that could shift maintenance from reactive to predictive. Most platforms addressed one or the other. SMART360 addressed both through a unified platform, meaning customer interactions, field dispatch, maintenance history, and compliance documentation all lived in one system rather than three disconnected ones.

The 12-week implementation timeline, longer than the electric cooperative's 8 weeks, reflected the scope of the change. This wasn't a billing upgrade. It was a fundamental shift in how customers interacted with the utility and how field teams operated. A phased rollout meant staff weren't asked to change everything at once, and the sandbox training environment gave customer service teams confidence before the portal went live.

SMART360 MODULES USED

Five modules. One platform. From reactive to proactive across every function.

The Gas Distribution Company deployed SMART360 across five operational areas, each one directly targeting a specific source of cost, safety risk, or customer friction.

Customer Portal & Self-Service

Customers had no way to check balances, pay bills, or track service requests outside business-hours phone calls — driving a call center volume that far exceeded what the team could handle efficiently.

Customer Information System → gave customers a mobile app and web portal for bill payment, service requests, and account management — cutting call volume by 68% and driving a 78% self-service adoption rate with a 94% satisfaction score.

Field Service Management

Field crews operated on paper inspection records with no mobile system — documentation lagged, maintenance was dispatched reactively, and there was no link between field activity and the customer record.

Work & Service Orders → replaced paper with digital workflows — safety inspections with photo documentation, predictive maintenance scheduling, and real-time job updates that reduced field service costs by 41%.

Analytics Dashboard

Customer service, field performance, and infrastructure metrics lived in separate systems — management had no unified view and couldn't connect operational signals before they became cost problems.

AI & Analytics → delivered live dashboards across all operational areas — cutting compliance reporting time by 76% and giving management a single view of customer service, field, and infrastructure performance.

Billing Automation

Manual billing processes drove a significant share of inbound calls — customers phoning to understand bills, dispute charges, or confirm payments that hadn't been posted promptly.

Billings & Payments → automated the full billing cycle with real-time payment posting and digital delivery — reducing billing-related call volume and giving customers instant bill access through the self-service portal.

Regulatory Compliance Reporting

Safety inspections were recorded on paper and compliance reports assembled by hand — creating a high-risk documentation gap between what happened in the field and what regulators received.

Automated Compliance Reporting → digitized the full inspection and documentation workflow — automatic compliance alerts, field photo capture, and pre-built regulatory reports achieving a 99.7% compliance rate with 76% less reporting time.

THE IMPLEMENTATION

Twelve weeks. Four phases. A customer engagement model rebuilt from scratch.

A 12-week implementation for a 45,000-connection gas utility represents a deliberate pace, fast enough to deliver value quickly, structured enough to ensure every team arrived at go-live with confidence rather than uncertainty. The phased approach started with understanding before configuring, and training before launching.

Phase 1 · Assessment & discovery

System audit, call volume analysis, and root cause mapping

Full audit of customer service workflows, field inspection processes, billing operations, and compliance documentation — identifying specific call drivers and maintenance cost sources before any configuration began.

Phase 2 · Solution design

Portal design, predictive maintenance config, compliance automation

Customer portal built to the utility's brand and service workflows. Predictive maintenance rules configured from historical inspection data. Compliance templates mapped to regulatory requirements. Integration architecture designed for 7 existing systems.

Phase 3 · Data migration & integration

Customer records, inspection history, and billing data migrated securely

Historical customer, billing, and infrastructure data migrated to SMART360. All 7 existing systems connected via cloud-native integration. Mobile app deployed to field teams before portal launched to customers.

Phase 4 · Training & deployment

Role-based training for CSO, field, and compliance teams — then go-live

Customer service teams trained on new portal workflows and escalation paths. Field crews trained on digital inspection and job completion. Compliance staff trained on automated reporting. Sandbox environment used for all roles before go-live.

RESULTS

68% fewer calls. 41% lower maintenance costs. A call center that finally has capacity for the work that matters.

The call center calls were absorbed by a self-service portal that customers chose to use at a 78% adoption rate. That's not a deflection metric. It's a signal that customers preferred the digital experience once it existed. The call center didn't get quieter because customers stopped having questions. It got quieter because the questions now had a better answer than a phone queue.

68%

reduction in call center volume

78% customer self-service adoption — portal and mobile app

41%

reduction in maintenance costs

shift from reactive dispatch to predictive scheduling

$2.4M

in annual ongoing savings

sustained across customer service and field operations

9 months

to full ROI

from go-live to complete return on investment

94%

customer satisfaction score

measured after portal and self-service channel launch

99.7%

regulatory compliance rate

76% reduction in compliance reporting time — fully automated

The maintenance cost story is the one that compounds over time. A 41% reduction isn't achieved by doing the same work more cheaply — it's achieved by doing less emergency work because predictive scheduling caught problems earlier. For a gas utility, that difference has safety implications that don't show up in a cost line but matter significantly to regulators, insurers, and the communities served.

Compliance reached 99.7% and the reporting process that used to consume significant staff time dropped by 76%. Digital inspection records, photo documentation captured in the field, and automated compliance report generation turned a manual assembly process into a review process. Skilled engineers who spent time formatting regulatory submissions now spend that time on infrastructure planning.

What comes next

With call volume stabilized and maintenance costs structurally reduced, the Gas Distribution Company's roadmap focuses on extending the gains already in place. Predictive maintenance algorithms continue to improve as more inspection data flows through the system, each completed job adds to the model that determines when the next one should be scheduled.

The customer portal, now at 78% adoption, has headroom to become the primary service channel for commercial accounts that currently still rely on phone-based service. And the compliance infrastructure built for current regulatory requirements is the same foundation that accommodates new mandates without requiring a new implementation. The $2.4M in annual savings isn't a ceiling. It's a floor.

Utility Name
Gas Distribution Company
SERVICE AREA
450 sq miles, North America
Sector
Multi-service Gas Utility
SIZE
45,000 connections
PREVIOUS SYSTEM
None
Pain point
Call center was overwhelmed with routine customer inquiries while the field teams were stuck in reactive maintenance cycles
SMART360 Features USED
Get started  now
Simplify Your Operations.
Reduce Costs.
Improve Customer Satisfaction.
contact us today
contact us today
White Arrow
U
UtilAssist
Online
Powered by Bynry